Tuesday, May 17, 2011

ray ban wayfarer black polarized

ray ban wayfarer black polarized. ray ban wayfarer black
  • ray ban wayfarer black



  • ABernardoJr
    Apr 18, 03:23 PM
    LG was first (before iPhone) to release smart phone with capacitive screen and UI that looks suspiciously close to iPhone. Here is Prada:

    http://www.itechnews.net/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/PRADA-Phone-LG-KE850-1.jpg

    If Apple prevails in court. LG would be stupid not to sue Apple (and they would probably get more money considering iPhone volumes).

    Do you honestly think that even strikes anything close to a sufficient resemblance to the iPhone UI?





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. Ray-Ban 4140 Wayfarer Black
  • Ray-Ban 4140 Wayfarer Black



  • jayducharme
    Apr 5, 01:24 PM
    Jail break is legal for personal use. Corporate use of jail break may be another thing altogether.

    But Toyota wasn't jailbreaking. Didn't the courts rule that Apple couldn't stop the jailbreak community?





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. ray ban wayfarer black
  • ray ban wayfarer black



  • lilo777
    Apr 18, 03:56 PM
    They could, but that would be cutting off their nose to spite their face.

    Not at all. They can use those components for producing Galaxy devices. And they can use free Foxconn resources (since they would not be assembling iPhones anymore) for assembling. :D





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. ray ban wayfarer black
  • ray ban wayfarer black



  • aswitcher
    Aug 4, 07:43 AM
    Wining Switchers should be Apple's goal now.


    Agreed. So that means...

    Leopard - seemless Windows intergration...

    Target the multimedia computer market with those wanting their HDTVs and iPods to connect to their new Mac. Make the mac part of the furniture and easy to operate.

    Geek switchers. Along with Leopard / Windows, they will want decent gaming punch which means a Mac Box with pro features like replacable graphics cards but still price competative. I see a low/min Mac Pro. Could be the same machine or a variation of the multimedia one. That way 2 birds one stone.

    Keep innovating. New tech stuff early. 802.11n. iPhones. Touch screens (without touch) etc.





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. rayban polarized for sale
  • rayban polarized for sale



  • Cedd
    Sep 11, 04:55 AM
    Ooooh... how we used to dream of wheels made out of lead. Ours were made of depleted uranium. :eek:


    You 'ad wheelbarrows and paper! Y'soft southern nancies...We 'ad to remember the binary code in our 'eads and if we got one number wrong our dads would kill us and dance on our shallow graves...

    'onestly, kids today. :rolleyes:





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. Ray-Ban - RB2132 NEW WAYFARER
  • Ray-Ban - RB2132 NEW WAYFARER



  • YS2003
    Nov 26, 11:41 AM
    I hope this rumor is true. If Apple is going to bring out the Tablet Mac, I would be buying one as long as it is a fully functional computer. I like my Fujitsu Tablet PC; but, it is still Windows-based PC. If Apple is going to market this, I guess their tablet Mac would be a very slick unit. I think non-tablet PC users are quick to dismiss the tablet format without knowing and experiencing it themselves. Fujitsu, Lenovo, Electrovaya, Motion Computer and a few others make a very light weight tablets. I don't like ones from Gateway and Toshiba as their units are way too heavy and chunky (and ugly looking to boot).





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. Rayban Original Wayfarer 54MM
  • Rayban Original Wayfarer 54MM



  • syklee26
    Sep 15, 06:22 PM
    I ordered my MBP today... the ship date isn't until the 20th? It said 24 hours on the site...

    A clue?

    Possibly?

    well that means maybe MBP is getting an upgrade next tuesday.





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. Zack Efron Ray Ban Wayfarer
  • Zack Efron Ray Ban Wayfarer



  • gruvdone
    Apr 26, 04:02 PM
    I love that argument - who told Apple to only make 1 phone? Nobody it was their decision. This is PC vs Mac all over again - history repeating itself.

    That's a narrow and erroneous view. Are there some parallels? Sure. There are however some important differences.

    First, market share is not anywhere near as important as revenue share. Apple is absolutely trouncing Google and everyone else in this area.

    Second, developers are not making any money on Android, as it's user base appears to be comprised of spend-thrifts. It doesn't matter how many people you have using the platform, if developers can't sell applications that well then the lure isn't as strong. Combine that with the exceedingly frustrating fragmentation and inconsistent experience from device to device that makes the task of even writing an Android application that much harder, and it is less appealing still. Will that slow Android down? No, as there will always be customers for the Wal-Mart of mobile operating systems. It does, however limit them as any sort of real 'threat'.

    Third, let us not forget that absolute whoring out of hardware at 2 or even 3 for 1 deals is a huge factor in this surge in usage. It's quite easy to inflate your numbers when you hand stuff out for free. Again, in reference to my previous point, they really aren't doing the platform any favors long term, as it will bring down the revenue curve.

    Fourth, these numbers are for the US only. The worldwide picture is very different.

    I can't wait to see how Steve Jobs spins this somehow at WWDC - my guess is he'll throw iPod Touches and iPads into their numbers so it doesn't look as horrible as the Nielsen chart shows.

    Why wouldn't he? iPod touch and iPad run the exact same mobile OS. Just because there is no real competition to either of these devices in the Android space, doesn't devalue their presence. Truthfully, I always take a skeptical stance on the motives of any 'report' on mobile OS usage which conveniently leaves these devices out. Smacks of fomenting, it does.


    Next up...tablets :D

    Yeah, cause that's been working out really well for them so far. Look, you can have your irrational "I hate Apple cause they are cool, and I rail against anything popular, cause I'M NOT A CONFORMIST!!!" BS all you want to. It doesn't change for one second the fact that Apple innovates, and everyone else imitates and tries to make all the money they can on the back of Apple's IP.

    Personally, I'd say enjoy it while you can. Apple has been establishing precedent with its patent litigation against smaller targets. Now they are taking on a medium-sized one in Samsung, and once that victory is complete, Google will be the next to fall.

    Look, I'm all for good old fashioned competition. But somebody besides Apple has to step up to the plate and actually create something. This whole me-too copycat crap is wearing thin.





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. ray ban wayfarer black
  • ray ban wayfarer black



  • Sky Blue
    May 9, 10:45 AM
    remember not everybodys itunes account is an email address

    yes it is.

    Anyway, you don't need an email address, just an account (username/password).





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. NEW RAY BAN Wayfarer 2140
  • NEW RAY BAN Wayfarer 2140



  • dba7dba
    Apr 26, 03:13 PM
    They will activate it for you in store so that shouldn't have been an issue.

    what about updates?





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. ray ban wayfarer black
  • ray ban wayfarer black



  • tlevier
    Apr 18, 03:46 PM
    couldn't Samsung simply get back at Apple by NOT making Apple's stuff? I mean, come on.

    I don't think so. 1) I think Apple has an agreement that Samsung can't break for cheap. 2) Samsung makes money on that transaction. 3) I think it might actually be against the law, like an anti-competitive move.





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. ray ban wayfarer black lens.
  • ray ban wayfarer black lens.



  • jsalzer
    Jul 30, 04:26 PM
    i think i'll buy a Macbook instead

    Ah, but the new iPhone can be purchased as a part of the package with a MacBook Pro - as it will conveniently fit into the ExpressCard/34 slot. It can be pulled out and used as a stand-alone phone, or it can be left in the slot to allow the user a full iChatAV phone experience from anywhere on the road.

    That slot had to be put there for a reason - and the remote doesn't fit. Right?

    :)

    OK, maybe not.





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. ray ban wayfarer black
  • ray ban wayfarer black



  • Tonsko
    Nov 15, 11:06 AM
    Is there anything it's not terribly good at? I've got some 6Gb ISOs and a couple of 40Gb Vms on my mbp...the scan gets to around 80% and then hangs. Could these be the culprits? I haven't tried excluding them yet, but thought I would canvas opinion as to the possible cause.





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. lack l ray ban wayfarer
  • lack l ray ban wayfarer



  • pkson
    Mar 30, 05:41 AM
    No, "best wishes" for our Japanese friends.

    "Prayers" to the flying spaghetti monster are a waste of time - put the people of Japan into your thoughts, don't involve some ficticious deity.

    Putting something in your thoughts doesn't do anything either.

    Unless you (not YOU, but people in general) hop on a plane and go over there to help, or at least donate to organizations who do, the most people can do is just be (or act) sad and concerned. Even being sad or concerned doesn't do anything for Japan.





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. Lens: Crystal Green Polarized
  • Lens: Crystal Green Polarized



  • mr.barkan
    Aug 11, 10:36 PM
    i thought i read somewhere that you needed like 4 gazillion gigs of ram to actually run 64 bit programs... so wouldn't merom be more for bragging rights than actual usability?

    i've been waiting since may for merom to come out so i can buy a mbp... but now i'm actually thinking of waiting til santa rosa comes out...

    If you keep waiting next gens you'll wait your whole life!! =)
    I know it sucks but I agree that this next MBP with Merom is a good buy for the next 3 months...

    I guess it just varies on your needs... I mean, I have to buy a laptop from aug/27 till aug/31 for this work I'm doing.. if the rumors are strong, maybe I'll buy some compaq 64bit 600-700 laptop(amd), then sell it as soon as the new MBP comes out... i dunno... just speculating... It's going to be a hard week for me... hate when I need things that don't just depend on me... buying a 1st gen a week before 2nd gen comes out... the worst thing you can do in Computer market.... =PPP





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. ray ban wayfarer black
  • ray ban wayfarer black



  • GuitarDTO
    Mar 28, 10:58 AM
    I think 2012 makes perfect sense for the iPhone 5. The 4 is still amazing and doesnt need a processor bump at the moment. Plus, I think the biggest thing, Apple wants to include 4G/LTE in the device. There is no point in releasing a 5 with just a processor bump unless it includes 4G, and my guess is they need a little more time polishing up the 4G device. The next iPhone could very well be a big change similar to 3GS to 4.





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. 13/04/2010. Kristen Cavallari
  • 13/04/2010. Kristen Cavallari



  • MrCrowbar
    Nov 23, 11:40 AM
    You own Apple do you? My! You've kept a very low profile!

    OMG STEVE IS HERE!!!

    Besides that he probably is, good one geese. :p





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. Sale Ray-Ban Wayfarer
  • Sale Ray-Ban Wayfarer



  • CalBoy
    May 3, 03:39 PM
    I see no reason why 99, 99.5, and 100 are easier to track than 37.2, 37.5, and 37.7. As you said, we accept body temp to be 98.6 and 37.0 in Celsius. If decimals are difficult to remember, then clearly we should pick the scale that represents normal body temp as an integer, right? ;)

    It doesn't matter what normal body temperature is because that's not what people are looking for when they take a temperature; they're looking for what's not normal. If it can be helped, the number one is seeking should be as flat as possible.

    There is a distinctive quality about 100 that is special. It represents an additional place value and is a line of demarcation for most people. For a scientist or professional, the numbers seem the same (each with 3 digits ending in the tenths place), but to the lay user they are very different. The average person doesn't know what significant digits are or when rounding is appropriate. It's far more likely that someone will falsely remember "37.2" as "37" than they will "99" as "98.6." Even if they do make an error and think of 98.6 as 99, it is an error on the side of caution (because presumably they will take their child to the doctor or at least call in).

    I realize this makes me seem like I put people in low regard, but the fact is that most things designed for common use are meant to be idiot-proof. Redundancies and warnings are hard to miss in such designs, and on a temperature scale, one that makes 100 "dangerous" is very practical and effective. You have to keep in mind that this scale is going to be used by the illiterate, functionally illiterate, the negligent, the careless, the sloppy, and the hurried.

    The importance of additional digits finds its way into many facets of life, including advertising and pricing. It essentially the only reason why everything is sold at intervals of "xx.99" instead of a flat price point. Marketers have long determined that if they were to round up to the nearest whole number, it would make the price seem disproportionately larger. The same "trick" is being used by the Fahrenheit scale; the presence of the additional digit makes people more alarmed at the appropriate time.


    Perhaps your set of measuring cups is the additional piece of equipment. Indeed you wouldn't need them. For a recipe in SI, the only items you would need are an electronic balance, graduating measuring "cup," and a graduated cylinder. No series of cups or spoons required (although, they do of course come in metric for those so inclined).

    Of course any amateur baker has at least a few cups of both wet and dry so they can keep ingredients separated but measured when they need to be added in a precise order. It just isn't practical to bake with 3 measuring devices and a scale (which, let's be real here, would cost 5 times as much as a set of measuring cups).

    This also relies on having recipes with written weights as opposed to volumes. It would also be problematic because you'd make people relearn common measurements for the metric beaker because they couldn't have their cups (ie I know 1 egg is half a cup, so it's easy to put half an egg in a recipe-I would have to do milimeter devision to figure this out for a metric recipe even though there's a perfectly good standard device for it).


    It might seem that way to you, but the majority of the world uses weight to measure dry ingredients. For them it's just as easy.

    Sure when you have a commercial quantity (which is also how companies bake in bulk-by weight), but not when you're making a dozen muffins or cupcakes. The smaller the quantity, the worse off you are with weighing each ingredient in terms of efficiency.


    Why would you need alternative names? A recipe would call for "30ml" of any given liquid. There's no need to call it anything else.

    So what would you call 500ml of beer at a bar? Would everyone refer to the spoon at the dinner table as "the 30?" The naming convention isn't going to disappear just because measurements are given in metric. Or are you saying that the naming convention should disappear and numbers used exclusively in their stead?


    Well, no one would ask for a 237ml vessel because that's an arbitrary number based on a different system of units. But if you wanted, yes, you could measure that amount in a graduated measuring cup (or weigh it on your balance).

    In that case, what would I call 1 cup of a drink? Even if it is made flat at 200, 250, or 300ml, what would be the name? I think by and large it would still be called a cup. In that case you aren't really accomplishing much because people are going to refer to it as they will and the metric quantity wouldn't really do anything because it's not something that people usually divide or multiply by 10 very often in daily life.


    I suspect people would call it a "quarter liter," much like I would say "quarter gallon."

    No, that would be 1/4 of a liter, not 4 liters. I'm assuming that without gallons, the most closely analogous metric quantity would be 4 liters. What would be the marketing term for this? The shorthand name that would allow people to express a quantity without referring to another number?


    And no, you wouldn't call 500ml a "pint" because, well, why would you? :confused:

    Well I'm assuming that beer would have to be served in metric quantities, and a pint is known the world over as a beer. You can't really expect the name to go out of use just because the quantity has changed by a factor of about 25ml.


    ...But countries using SI do call 500ml a demi-liter ("demi" meaning "half").

    Somehow I don't see that becoming popular pub lingo...


    This is the case with Si units as well. 500, 250, 125, 75, etc. Though SI units can also be divided by any number you wish. Want to make 1/5 of the recipe? ...Just divide all the numbers by five.

    Except you can't divide the servings people usually take for themselves very easily by 2, 4, 8, or 16. An eighth of 300ml (a hypothetical metric cup), for example, is a decimal. It's not very probable that if someone was to describe how much cream they added to their coffee they'd describe it as "37.5ml." It's more likely that they'll say "1/4 of x" or "2 of y." This is how the standard system was born; people took everyday quantities (often times as random as fists, feet, and gulps) and over time standardized them.

    Every standard unit conforms to a value we are likely to see to this day (a man's foot is still about 12 inches, a tablespoon is about one bite, etc). Granted it's not scientific, but it's not meant to be. It's meant to be practical to describe everyday units, much like "lion" is not the full scientific name for panthera leo. One naming scheme makes sense for one application and another makes sense for a very different application. I whole heartedly agree that for scientific, industrial, and official uses metric is the way to go, but it is not the way to go for lay people. People are not scientists. They should use the measuring schemes that are practical for the things in their lives.

    Not that OS X Panthera Leo doesn't have a nice ring to it, of course. ;)


    No, but it is onerous for kids to learn SI units, which is a mandatory skill in this global world. Like I said, why teach kids two units of measure if one will suffice?

    It's onerous to learn how to multiply and divide by 10 + 3 root words? :confused: Besides, so many things in our daily lives have both unit scales. My ruler has inches and cm and mm. Bathroom scales have pounds and kg. Even measuring cups have ml written on them.

    You could be right for international commerce where values have to be recalculated just for the US, but like I said, I think those things should be converted. I don't really care if I buy a 25 gram candy bar as opposed to a 1 ounce candy bar or a 350ml can of soda.


    Perhaps true, but just because you switch to metric, doesn't mean you need to stop using tablespoons and teaspoons for measurements. It's all an approximation anyway, since there are far more than 2 different spoon sizes, and many of them look like they're pretty much equal in size to a tablespoon.

    I'm sorry, but which tablespoons do you use that aren't tablespoons? The measuring spoons most people have at home for baking are very precise and have the fractions clearly marked on them.

    Other than that, there's a teaspoon, tablespoon, and serving spoon (which you wouldn't use as a measurement). The sizes are very different for each of those and I don't think anyone who saw them side by side could confuse them.


    So if you're cooking, do what everyone else does with their spoons; if you need a tablespoon, grab the big-ish one and estimate. If you needed more precision than that, why wouldn't you use ml? :confused:

    Because it's a heck of a lot easier to think, "I need one xspoon of secret ingredient" than it is to think, "I need xml of secret ingredient." You think like a scientist (because you are one). Most people aren't. That's who the teaspoons and tablespoons are for.





    ray ban wayfarer black polarized. ray ban wayfarer 2140
  • ray ban wayfarer 2140



  • Jape
    Dec 3, 02:18 PM
    Jape,
    did you ever hear back from BLT??

    I have heard nothing but didn't send email to them. Will do that today.

    No I haven't heard back, I sent them another email this morning but they haven't replied





    0815
    Apr 5, 02:56 PM
    I travel internationally weekly, and EVERY international iPhone carrier is bound by their arms and legs just like AT&T. It's Apple's way or no way. Want to advertise iPhone? MUST be Apple's advertisements. Want to offer iPhone? Must include visual voicemail as Apple wants it. Want to sell iPhone? Must be at Apple's prices with apple's terms.

    Want to break the contract with Apple? Must turn over your first born child. It's the same story in every country. I am very well traveled, and I'm very familiar with iPhone in other countries. I bought both mine in the UK, FYI

    even google disagrees with you - they wish in the meantime to have forced more control over the carriers (as they already admitted in the public) :D





    iVeBeenDrinkin'
    Apr 9, 08:55 PM
    (48/2)(9+3) would be straight forward. The way the formula was originally typed lends interpretation as:

    48/
    2(9+3)

    Why would someone choose to group one set with parentheses and not another unless they were being intentionally ambiguous?

    Did you call your elementary school teacher? I didn't. They taught me well enough the first time.

    iVeBeenDrinkin' likes this.





    wovel
    Apr 7, 12:25 PM
    Wow. I think you missed the point. At 1199, the MacbookPRO should have a discrete option...hell, POS HP's at 600.00 do.

    Oh, and please spare me the snarky "well then enjoy your HP! Har har har" comment.




    islanders
    Jul 23, 10:33 PM
    We may see a drop in the MB at the end of a production run.

    $1099 is very reasonable, esp if it is a quality product�

    at that price consumers are going to evaluate features, longevity�

    although I think it is a valid point to consider pricing for consumer end.





    appleguy123
    May 3, 10:49 PM
    I don't know what you guys mean by leaders. We make our decisions individually in the thread, right?



    No comments:

    Post a Comment